Talk:History of Cadusii

Do not merge

Please do not merged these articles, because i want yet write about history of cadusii and it will be to many for one article. Aharon Erman (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merging the article with Cadusii seems to make more sense than leaving it alone. There is no reason that this article would necessitate its own page.

19:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Support merge of properly sourced material. Unneeded CFORK, if the history section of the main article or the article itself become unmanagable it can be split SUMMARYSTYLE, but at this point this is wholely unneeded. Given the sourcing in this article, I don't believe the main article will become unmanagable. @Aharon Erman: if you can properly source this article (I tagged) and show sourcing exist for other notable stand alone articles that would make this fit into a SUMMARYSTYLE, ping me. // Timothy :: talk 20:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support redirect to Cadusii I don't think importing the info to Cadusii is a good idea, History of Cadusii is in quite a messy state and made use (just removed them) of a lot of WP:PRIMARY sources (in fact, it looks like a WP:POVFORK, it looks like what Cadusii looked like before I cleaned it up [1]). --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, indeed a WP:POVFORK, lots of similarities [2] [3]. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]