Talk:HD 102365

Planet

Scientists found one planet around the star A of this System:

see at: http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/727/2/103

and http://exoplanet.eu/planet.php?p1=HD+102365&p2=b —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.83.98.67 (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I include an "exoplanet box" for this planet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.83.99.240 (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. RJH (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 08 February 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to HD 102365. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HR 4523 → HD 102365 – This star is more commonly referred to by this designation, as seen in SIMBAD and in Google Scholar results (while the HR designation does technically show up more in GS results, many of these are about a bill named "HR 4523", and not about the star). --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC) StringTheory11 (t • c) 20:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: Rather than just asserting the existence of evidence supporting the proposal, it would be helpful if the nominator linked to it. That makes it much easier for editors to verify it.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment; according to BHG's suggestion, here are the relevant links: SIMBAD result for the object, HD 102365 from GS, and HR 4523 from GS (note that many results are actually completely irrelevant to the topic, and instead discuss bills, etc.). StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency I'd hope we try to keep as uniform names with as few variations as possible. HD pretty widely used so I support it being the article location here. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.