Talk:Green Line (CTA)

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Mid-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Green Line (CTA).

On 13 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to CTA Green Line. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BuscandoMiyagi773.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This article, and other CTA articles read like a wandering conversation. They could use a few edits, but I'm not the best English writer by any stretch of the imagination. —Rob (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I added a chart of stations here, think it could be useful. Locations need to be filled in, I may undertake that at some point in the future, but in all I think this is a more handy reference than having to go to the list of all L stations. - User:Theb04t 4/18/2007

Merger proposal

I propose that South Side Elevated (CTA) be merged into Green Line (CTA). The content in South Side Elevated can easily be explained in the context of Green Line. The Green Line article is still light and doesn't contain enough material to yet warrant a split. Also, much of the information contained within South Side Elevated is a duplication of material from here. Lost on Belmont^3200N (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not duplicated from the original article! The only thing I took from the Green Line is a section from the station listing! Everything in that article were put into my words and not duplicated from any site or any other article! You can take every word from that article and look it up and I bet you will find most of it in that article! Most of the info included in the article were put into my own words! Please get back to me ASAP! OZODOR (talk) 01:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The duplication is not in the specific words, but rather in content. Route, stations, etc. This isn't about making you stop. There are just ways of doing things on Wikipedia. Lost on Belmont^3200N (talk) 03:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, I object this merger proposal and I removing that template from the article! I work so hard on these articles and I am tired of them being removed! I was fine with the Ravenswood article being removed, but this can't go on forever! Wikipedia is suppose to be an exciting encyclopedia with friendly users, but that thought is not the truth! Please close this discussion and leave the article where it stands! Thank you! OZODOR (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Anything which would be covered by this article can be covered by either Green Line (CTA) or South Side Elevated Railroad. The title should probably be left as a disambiguation page between those two articles after the merge. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 06:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fine! You can get rid of this one too but the North Side Main Line article will always stay! You can go ahead and remove this article and this discussion is closed! OZODOR (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. In almost all cases I don't think there is any need to separate the CTA infrastructure and the CTA operations into two articles—they can both be adequately covered by the line articles, and splitting them results in needless duplication of information. The exceptions for me would be where most or all of a piece of infrastructure is shared by multiple lines, such as the Loop, then consolidating into one article makes sense as it avoids having to repeat the same information in each of the line articles. —Jeremy (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay! Go ahead and merge the article! I didn't get what you guys were talking about, so I freaked out a bit! I would also want to thank Lost on Belmont^3200N for putting a route map on the North Side Main Line article! I knew something was missing! Thanks! OZODOR (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Umm... will the article get moved or what?! Its still here and we really aren't debating whether it should be merged or kept!!! The Smell of Magic 02:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Demolished stations in route maps

see: Talk:Purple Line (CTA)#Demolished stations in route maps

Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 18:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Red Line (CTA) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]