Talk:Great Northern route

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Hertfordshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

Untitled

Actually i am not really sure this counts as a proper line. It is often referred to as the Great Northern franchise, which is why i created this article. Please clarify Simply south 16:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well there are tracks, and they to and from somewhere: it's a line, of lesser importance, but a line never the less. You might need to categorise your article. Captain scarlet 20:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Category referred to is Category:Railway lines of England, although whether it can be counted as one of them I am not too sure. I guess if the railway timetables label it as such - cp eg Pontefract Line - it is OK. The problem is to differentiate a description of a rail route (ie the geographical character of the particular railway line) with a marketing name to sell the services! Peter Shearan 09:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or should i merge this with the Great Northern Railway as it follows much of its old route to Peterborough. That is probably where the name for the franchise comes from Simply south 09:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've gathered, merge it into East Cast Main Line, not Great Northern Railway as the articles relates to the line, not the service or operation or TOC information. Any services information should really be on a line's page or a TOC's page, as opposed to its own page where so little information would feature. Captain scarlet 11:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great Northern Route. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110607023551/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/Consultation/Hitchin/6428_Hitchin%20-%20Statement%20of%20Case.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/Consultation/Hitchin/6428_Hitchin%20-%20Statement%20of%20Case.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Northern Route. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Northern Route. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 01:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great Northern Route → Great Northern route – WP:CAPITALISATION. 053pvr (talk) 02:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 04:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). 053pvr (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note request contested by User:buidhe. 053pvr (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose According to Google, "Great Northern route" refers to driving along US Highway 2 or alternately, various 19th-century rail systems[1] I think this may need a dab, to Great Northern Route (London) or something like it. This is a specific route, and I've seen no evidence that it isn't consistently capitalized as you would expect for a proper noun. (t · c) buidhe 07:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looking at raw results is misleading here as you need to distinguish between uses of the three words as a proper name and uses that refer to the route of trains operated by the Great Northern portion of the TSGN franchise. That said, it seems that "Great Northern route" is slightly more common capitalisation when referring to the former in reliable sources but there is inconsistency. Capital: National Rail, Women in Rail, Railway News. Lower Case: DfT Consultaiton, The Railway Hub, Eversholt Rail, National Audit Office, London Assembly. My search results, including in a private window, show that this is the primary topic so no disambiguation should be taken (even if we have content about the American uses of the term), but if it is then "(London)" is incorrect as it serves a much wider area - "(England)" would be more accurate. Thryduulf (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – most of the cited sources don't even use this term at all. The first one I found that does uses lower route. It's not a proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 06:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Dicklyon. Doesn't seem that it is a proper noun. "Great Northern" is the capitalised entity, and this is its route. — Amakuru (talk) 13:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.