Talk:Gift shop
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Merge-arrows.svg/50px-Merge-arrows.svg.png)
- A belated oppose. First, a brief skim of the sources reveal that museum shops very much meet criteria for a standlone article. Second, Gift shop has no sources, while Museum shop is well-sourced for a stub (asssuming good-faith on the offline sources). Merging the two without resulting in undue weight on museum stores will be tricky. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose A gift shop and a museum shop are quite different. --Macrakis (talk) 23:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Adding on to Macrakis, the phenomenon of museums beginning to include shops as supplements to their revenue and the criticism to those practices are definitely independently notable. :3 F4U (they/it) 13:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Tourism articles
- Low-importance Tourism articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles