Talk:Gangstar: Crime City

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Gangstar: Crime City. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Gangstar: Crime City at the Reference desk.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (1 participant)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Article expansion

I think a plot summary and a character list would be a nice addition to the Gangstar article... Blake Gripling 12:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! TTL GS (talk) 23:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External link to fandom wiki

The link to fandom has been removed repeatedly by myself (and Billinghurst) as a violation of our external linking guidelines. Per WP:ELNO #1 we should not link to "any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. In other words, the site should not merely repeat information that is already or should be in the article." If, for some reason, the fandom link should be included against the guidelines, then there would need to be consensus for its inclusion here prior to adding it.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then why doesn't someone who knows about the Wookiepedia links on "Star Wars" articles remove said links? TTL GS (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've already replied to your whataboutism ad nauseum on your talk page. You need to focus on getting consensus for this specific link for this specific article. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]