Talk:Gagged (EP)

Gagged (EP) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 12, 2016. (Reviewed version).

On 26 October 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gagged. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Drag Race Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drag Race, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Drag Race (franchise) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Drag RaceWikipedia:WikiProject Drag RaceTemplate:WikiProject Drag RaceDrag Race
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on December 15, 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Gagged (EP) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that drag queen Violet Chachki's EP Gagged was inspired by her time working as an assistant to a dominatrix?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gagged (EP).

Wikipedia

Use of Female Pronouns

Hello, I created the article, and used female pronouns when referring to Violet Chachki as that was the language used by the sources. If you feel like this should be changed, please let me know. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasoning seems appropriate. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a clear consensus that the current primary redirect to Gag is justified. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 16:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gagged (EP) → Gagged – There is no other article with this title. Tree Critter (talk) 15:31, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- @Tree Critter: That doesn't mean gagged shouldn't be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Gag, as it currently is. I'm personally not sure, but I can't see this move as uncontroversial in any case. Lennart97 (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Definitely not uncontroversial, because the argument could be made that the primary meaning of gagged is the past tense of gag rather than the name of the record, regardless of exact match. Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the long-term significance of Gag and the EP has 49 views compared with 4,930 for Gag. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the current primary redirect is justified. The exact title match does not guarantee a primary topic, see also related discussion at Talk:Without (The X-Files)#Requested move 24 October 2021. 162 etc. (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. To be completely transparent, I created this article in 2016 (and I cannot believe it has been that many years ago) and I believe I am the primary contributor for this article. I understand the nominator's rationale, but I agree with the oppose arguments. I do not think this is the primary topic. I think more readers would be looking for the gag article and would be astonished to be directed to an article on a rather obscure EP. It makes more sense to me to have gagged remain a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to gag. Aoba47 (talk) 23:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose my thought process is that Gag has multiple issues and a grand total of three references, and has for the past several years, meanwhile Gagged is a GA that could have a hatnote. I understand Talk:Without (The X-Files)#Requested move 24 October 2021, I actually probably should have put discuss=no for that one, but I personally feel Gag can hardly stand on its own three references enough to have Gagged be a primary topic redirect to it. It'd be more justifiable to me if Gag saw a big revamp. Tree Critter (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The EP is clearly not the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Gag is far more appropriate. TiggerJay (talk) 16:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Gag is correct. @Tree Critter: no more technical requests of this sort please. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.