Talk:G.E.M.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the G.E.M. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

My Fairytale was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 November 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into G.E.M.. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

G.E.M. (singer) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 May 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into G.E.M.. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

China: Entertainment Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese-language entertainment taskforce (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,039)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,447) • Stub-Class articles (6,729)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (389) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

Hi, first of all, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia and working on this article. I assessed the article to "Start"-Class and I have some suggestions for improving it.

Non-free images need to follow the Non-free content criteria, I removed the non-free images because they fail the requirement for non-free material to "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" and that its "omission would be detrimental to that understanding". CD covers and billboards do neither.
Reliable sources need to be used, that means "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". Currently the article has unfortunately none of those, but relies on the stuff from game-show and cooking tv episodes. Information based on newspaper articles or other published sources is needed. Trivial info, like what her name stands for, can still be cited by her artist website, but it is not necessarily a good source for other info.
Per WP:ELNEVER linking to to material that violates copyright is considered contributory copyright infringement, which is why I removed the YouTube clip of the TV report. Content on the website of the copyright holder (the TV station) can be linked to.
The articles uses peacock terms, as in "famous drama", "major competition" - these should always be avoided, and instead it should be described why things are important etc., using reliable sources.
Apart from needing sources the article needs to have more substantial content for a higher rating. It consists mainly of lists as of now. The awards section lists a lot of awards but they are not sourced at all and with quite a few it is not clear that they are notable.
The lead should summarize the article. The article has not much content but the lead should at least establish why she is considered notable (compare WP:MUSICBIO).

Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There were many citations to the Chinese Wikipedia added. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source so these citations should be removed. Her record label website should only be used for trivial citations and is not a reliable source. YesAsia looks like a trader, comparable to amazon.com, which is not considered a reliable source. Other sources include the artist's blog at xanga.com, which is also not considered a reliable source. Facebook is not reliable either. The ifpihk.org, Sun Daily, and Oriental Daily News look good. I added a template under the banners that makes searching for more reliable sources easier. Unfortunately it seems as though there are almost no English language reliable sources. Hekerui (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

I'm reassessing this article to C based on it falling short to the B class criteria.

The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.
Inline citations are well covered except the Music pop chart section. Some of the sources such as ones from yesasia.com and xanga.com are questionable to be reliable sources. Not a requirement for B class, but for good practice, web citation should include accessdate and title, also avoid including just the url.
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
All sections are well covered.
The article has a defined structure.
Lead section is too short, see WP:LEAD. For an article of this size, I would recommend 2-3 solid paragraph that summarize every sections.
The article is reasonably well-written.
It probably needs WP:COPYEDIT.
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
Article structure is well organized.
The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.
Same as 4.

Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 05:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOVE

After the matter was raised at Talk:18... I have moved the title from Gem (singer) to G.E.M. (singer) per SCMP and other print sources. If anyone objects, WP:BRD by all means. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

I have removed unsourced content from this biography of a living person. There is probably unreliably sourced content remaining. I have no objections to restoring the content if it is supported by reliable sources. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on G.E.M. (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100308023316/http://www.hummingbird.hk:80/Home/News/Entries/2009/11/20_G.E.M.s_first_concert_18LIVE.html to http://www.hummingbird.hk/home/News/Entries/2009/11/20_G.E.M.s_first_concert_18LIVE.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interview

Anything new in this BBC interview? [1]

Should I remove unused reference

I noticed that there is a unused reference that is resulting in a error that is visible at the bottom of the article. Should I remove this reference? Linxgos (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]