Talk:Fred Ford (programmer)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fred Ford (programmer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Fred Ford" programmer – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Articles for Deletion debate
[edit]This article was to be merged Star Control or somewhere else appropriate as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 22:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- I do not find any such merging any more necessary than with Paul Reiche III. Merging with Toys For Bob sounds much more reasonable, although it is rather pointless as well. Besides, this article could grow a fair bit with right information. - 194.89.3.82 20:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Ditto. If anything it should be merged wtih Toys For Bob but I don't think we should. - DNewhall
- I agree. The information on this article is scant. If it actually covered what he really did over his entire (current) career, it would be much longer and needn'd be merged with Toys for Bob. — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 11:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)