Jump to content

Talk:Foundation 9 Entertainment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Games?

[edit]

What games have they developed? --Pravit726

Yeah, this article needs to mention products they made. Also, this article needs categories. And some external links. --12.108.252.34
It has an external link. Frecklefoot | Talk 19:42, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

Not largest

[edit]

They are the largets INDIE developer, but far from the largest in North America. --70.177.90.192

That's a good point, and it's noted in the article. Frecklefoot | Talk
This fact seems dated. The quoted number in the January 2007 rev of the page was 750 employees. Since that time, there have been noted two studio closures, one spin-off and one consolidation with cutbacks. Is there a verifiable current source that indicates the number of employees is still in this range? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.103.92.105 (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just updated

[edit]

I've just updated the article to read better and removed some unnecessary parts, including those that sound like advertisement. Would it be ok to remove the advertisement tag now?

Also, any suggestions on whether the article needs listing of games made by F9E? Considering that it's really just a collection of studios, all of whom have their own Wiki pages which detail the games each has developed, I didn't deem it necessary to include that. Agent Sleeper (talk) 22:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Majestic Entertainment correct? Do you mean Majesco Entertainment? User:nippbit 207.170.253.196 (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I'm pretty sure that we don't need the advertisement banner. It looks basically unbiased to me. ReagentX (talk) 04:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foundation 9 Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]