Talk:Fort Cascades

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NRHP

I can't find Fort Cascades on the usual sources Elkman Infobox Generator, the less trustworthy NRHP.com, etc. What is its reference number (refnum), NRHP name, and date? I have marked the WP nrhp template "needs-infobox=no." This should be changed back if it is on the NRHP. KudzuVine (talk) 00:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @KudzuVine!

Remember this from 12 years ago?! Turns out that the NRHP listing for Fort Cascades is incorporated into the overall North Bonneville Archeological District. I've made appropriate changes to the pages involved, but please take a look (if you're interested) and see if anything is missing or could be corrected.

Thanks!

Shortiefourten (talk) 17:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't recall. But it is good that you found the actual NRHP title as the North Bonneville Archeological District. I cannot find the actual NRHP documentation either. I just end up with the statement that it is not digitized. Without it, we cannot say if the District is just the fort or has more than the fort. It would be nice to tie the Fort to the District in the text. I did find https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:North_Bonneville_AD_NRHP_87000498_Skamania_County,_WA.jpg, which says it is a "North Bonneville Archeological District Pictographic boulder from the inundated Archaeological Site is mounted on the front plaza of the County Courthouse in Stevenson." I don't know if this relates to the Fort. KudzuVine (talk) 23:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Cascades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224184446/http://www.iinet.com:80/~englishriver/LewisClarkColumbiaRiver/Regions/Places/fort_cascades.html to http://www.iinet.com/~englishriver/LewisClarkColumbiaRiver/Regions/Places/fort_cascades.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]