Jump to content

Talk:Flavours (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 13 July 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Flavours (album). Jenks24 (talk) 12:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



FlavoursFlavours (The Guess Who album) – As it stands redirecting non-American readers to an album is hilarious (if you have a sense of humo[u]r), but apart from that, it's also a magnet for mislinks from food articles where Canadian, British, Irish and Australian editors have been editing. Flavors (album) redirects to American R&B girl group Tiffany Affair, so the band name would be advisable but Flavours (album) is possible if we think hiding The Guess Who will help those looking for The Guess Who album. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any evidence that this is the primary meaning of the term flavours? I find that questionable since flavours is the plural of flavour which is how flavor is spelled outside the US (Canada, UK, etc).At this time I would support the move. There is also precidence for this when the article Parachutes was moved to Parachutes (album). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.29.1 (talk) 14:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes actually. The UK/US spelling difference actually helps us out here. We can look at the pageviews for "Flavours" vs. "Flavors" and see if one gets significantly more than the other. If yes, there is presumably a reason. Here are the pageviews for June:
That's 3.5x more people viewing "Flavours" than "Flavors". The likeliest reason for the difference between the two is that people are looking for the album. I would also point to the relatively few mislinks to "Flavours" meaning the taste sensation. Dohn joe (talk) 15:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But as you know, we no longer have primary topics of this sort Talk:Parachutes (album) and Talk:Bookends (album) you fought against - but they have all been moved in a series of RM with those 3 left behind as untouchables. And in this case no one would claim an old Canadian album rivals the food industry. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.