Talk:Figure Eight Island

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Vandalism is a No-No...

Figure Eight Island is an island in North Carolina, just north of Wrightsville Beach, with approximately 441 homes, also where Tom Squire resides, rep that 28403 homie.

Tsk Tsk...

Reverted. Seary6579 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parsons 8 Surf Court

What is Parsons 8 Surf Court? Is it a specific address or a club? If it is a club, where on the island is it located?

Crumpe217 (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

filming or no?

the article currently reads:

The Island is also a known filming location for the popular TV show, Dawsons Creek, with the urban scenes filmed nearby in the city of Wilmington.

No movie or TV show has ever been allowed to shoot on the island.

Huh?—msh210℠ 20:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

etymology of name

It'd be nice if the etymology of the name were added in.—msh210℠ 20:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Figure Eight Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ligon Flynn Red Link

Regarding the single Ligon Flynn Red Link in the Figure Eight Island article, per WP:Red Link, there is no problem with having Red Links for articles that are either forthcoming or should be. Ligon Flynn actually happens to be a noted architect, with a distinctive indiginous architectural style and a storied, award-winning career. A study conducted in 2008 showed that red links helped Wikipedia grow, and keep articles from being orphaned from the start. So please stop stripping the Red Link from the article. Thanks. 842U (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for this. I continued to revert the red link edit because there had not been a specified reason given in the edit summary until the last time you added it to the article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Issues

The article has numerous issues: in places it is written like an advertisement, overall it does not have a neutral tone (no controversy, problems, etc), and the tone or style doesn't reflect the encyclopedic tone. It's possible that one editor is close to the subject matter and displays ownership issues. 842U (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that prior to some of your edits the article's tone was not encyclopedic. After your recent edits, however, I fail to see the necessity of the article being tagged. I would like to point out that there is a controversy already mentioned as its own subsection in the article. Do you expect small vacation destinations to have a multitude of controversies and problems? Is this standard held for other North Carolinian beaches on Wikipedia? Say Bald Head Island, Emerald Isle, Sunset Beach, Wrightsville Beach, etc.. ? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please excercise Good Faith here; it's a central tenant to successful editing. Also, please review Ownership to be sure collaborative editing is taking place and that the article isn't only representing the point of view of single editor.842U (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not acting as an owner of the article. I am merely asking a question. If you are able to find additional controversies then by all means add them. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Surprisingly was able to find information regarding a drug smuggling incident, a house fire, and two shark attacks which I have added to the article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]