Talk:Fairlight (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Fair use rationale for Image:Fairlight tittle screen.png

Image:Fairlight tittle screen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

There are a number of issues with the "Reception" section:

It's written in bullet points. It should be rewritten in paragraphs.
It contains two bullet points about issues that Bo Jangeborg had with Edge. These aren't related to the game's reception, so should not appear in this section.
The aforementioned two bullet points make claims that aren't fully substantiated. They're supported by a citation, but the citation is an interview with Bo Jangeborg himself. I don't think that's enough to represent them as fact. Instead, I'd recommend prefacing them with "According to Jangeborg", or similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.161.94.129 (talk) 15:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source

https://archive.org/details/edgeuk135/page/n89