Talk:FASA

FASA was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 12, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Role-playing games High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Board and table games High‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA failed

1. Well written? OK (except the lead part)

2. Factually accurate? Fail (needs more references)

3. Broad in coverage? OK

4. Neutral point of view? Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images? OK

Additional comments :

Lead section is too long (See WP:LEAD) and adds original material/new material not talked through the article.
Not enough references.
The Games published by FASA included: section should be renamed to something like Published games or FASA games.
In this Games published by FASA included: section one would wish to find a description of every games.
Since most of the wikilinked articles are redlinks, there should be some explanation of the redlink-words to help the reader.
Under the new commercial direction and with the Mort's capital injection, the company diversified into books and miniature figures. is not well prosed.
Instead of writing figures or miniature figures shouldn't they be figurines like in Warhammer games or D&D games?
I seriously doubt the article is broad enough.
If one has time maybe adding a picture or two would help the article too even if they are well-described fair use pictures.

Lincher 17:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "Microsoft destroyed FASA" interview

Weissman recently had an interview with GamesIndustry.biz where he said that Microsoft essentially destroyed FASA upon its acquisition. The article can be found here: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/microsoft-destroyed-development-culture-weisman (Psychoneko (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Contradiction?

The article claims FASA "closed" yet later on it claims the company is still active but as a company that is simply holding and licensing IP's, isn't contradicting? --Elven6 (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek RPG

FASA did not produce the first licensed Star Trek RPG. That honor goes to Heritage Models who produced "Star Trek: Adventure Gaming in the Final Frontier" in 1978.

Allen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allenshock (talk • contribs) 07:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self-reference & nuclear device

Actually, the said nuclear device in Shadowrun novel Brightlight' (also refered in several Shadowrun RPG sourcebooks) was detonated in the power plant on Cermak Road. FASA offices then were on at 1100 W Cermak Road, right in front of the plant, not on Van Buren. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.227.158.197 (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

What does the acronym FASA stand for?

After it stopped being “Freedonian Aeronautics and Space Administration,” of course. Felicity4711 (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source

https://web.archive.org/web/20001202015400/http://www.wired.com:80/wired/archive/1.03/battletech_pr.html