Talk:Essential infimum and essential supremum
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Equivalent Characterization
[edit]I will add the equivalent characterization in terms of functions g = f a.e. as soon as my dumb ass can reprove the equivalence.--128.171.31.11 (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Values in C?
[edit]Maybe a remark that this is not defined for functions with values in ℂ ? or is it? Noix07 (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- It's not, and it's not worth remarking on it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 27 February 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Essential supremum and essential infimum → Essential infimum and essential supremum – For consistency with Infimum and supremum. This is both the alphabetical order and the order from smaller to greater. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Makes sense to me. ~ HAL333 00:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
In terms of p-norms
[edit]Is there a standard definition for essential supremum along the lines of the definition of L∞(x, y) (supremum norm) as limp→+∞ Lp(x, y)? If you know of it, would you add it? 66.194.253.20 (talk) 19:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)