Talk:Enzai: Falsely Accused
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
Awful...
[edit]This is simply awful and I'm sure this all pulled from somewhere else on the net and muffed up to the state you see now! If there are no objections - and time permitting I will do a complete re-write. --Sharonlees 14:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Sharonlees. This page is distasteful. --Lycheejelly 01:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I first I din't know what you two were talking about but after a bit of searching around the net I can now see what you meant. This is like a cut-and-paste job. So I too will give you a han-up for making a new one on Enzai.
I vote to at least have the Legacy part rewritten. It's obvious that the voice of the person who wrote that section was bias in some aspects and just doesn't like the game. Also, the person described psychological conditions as diseases, which is incorrect. The article over-all could be better though. --Kleptomaniac Can Opener 03:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I think there should be more about the OVAs. They're not even mentioned, if we don't count the external links. I was hoping to find some info on them, since I haven't seen them yet. --Lise 17:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Unsourced statements.
[edit]Another thing to be mentioned is the accuracy in portraying the different kinds of mental illnesses that the various characters suffer from. The various disorders afflicting Enzai's cast are efficiently represented in their real symptoms...
This statement is unsourced. While it may be true, we still need a credible source to verify it. Until then, I'm going to change it a little, okay? Abby724 02:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Due to the American censorship laws...
- I've removed that comment for now. It's been a while and we still don't have a source on it. However, if anyone digs up any info regarding that statement (looking into laws regarding pornography censorship, child pornography laws, etc.) I'd be happy to put it back in. Abby724
So far the article is free of unsourced statements. I advise anyone that before adding information to the article that it's actually verifiable. Abby724 04:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Prohibits computer-generated child pornography when "(B) such visual depiction is a computer image or computer-generated image that is, or appears virtually indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (as amended by 1466A for Section 2256(8)(B) of title 18, United States Code).
- I found that at PROTECT Act of 2003's article. I think that might be a good reference regarding why the characters of Enzai got their ages all raised. Sure, the characters were hand-drawn, but the scenes involving them are called CGs; Computer Graphics. The law probably applies to them, too. Anyone else agree that this might be useful in the article? Abby724 21:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oh well. I mentioned it in the article. However, it's not properly referenced; anyone have any idea how to cite things from National Law Codes? Abby724 21:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Start-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- Start-Class visual novel-related articles
- Visual novels task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class anime and manga articles
- Low-importance anime and manga articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- Anime and manga articles with incomplete B-Class checklists
- Start-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles