Talk:Enforcement

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

Definition

Jhunter, ould you explain the reasoning for having this as an article on only one of the very minor uses of the word enforcement? This stubby stuff is about management or personnel (human resources perhaps) and it should stay there. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. II | (t - c) 15:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@JHunterJ and ImperfectlyInformed: I think it would be more reasonable to redirect this page to Enforcement (disambiguation). The topic of this article is not clearly described, so it's difficult to understand what it is about. Jarble (talk) 21:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable, yeah. The disambiguation page could also be improved. Do you want to redirect the page or should I? II | (t - c) 04:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ImperfectlyInformed: We should merge this page as long as User:JHunterJ allows it. Jarble (talk) 02:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My explanation was in the edit summary from the rv of the move: "rv move setting up WP:MALPLACED; use WP:RM for the multimove." So, please do not redirect this page to Enforcement (disambiguation) (see WP:MALPLACED). Instead, use WP:RM (either a full discussion, or I have no objection to a technical request, as long as no one else does) to move the disambiguation page here. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

incomprehensible

Despite dozens of edits, this article has essentially the exact same incomprehensible content as more than 4 years ago! This content was obviously written by someone whose mother tongue is not English, but some of the many editors since then must have been native speakers, but none of them improved it or even added a maintenance tag. --Espoo (talk) 14:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Espoo: I've only just come across this article (while trying to resolve some {{Disambiguation needed}} tags). My brain hurts. Like you, I cannot understand why this article (essentially a bad dictionary definition) is still here. I don't see it as a {{Dabprimary}} topic; I can't think of any primary article-worthy meaning for "enforcement". "What links here" is all over the place, and needs cleanup. I say the current text should be binned, and replaced by the contents of Enforcement (disambiguation) (itself a seriously mediocre page). Narky Blert (talk) 22:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Enforcement (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]