This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiki Loves Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women in Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Wiki Loves WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenTemplate:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenWiki Loves Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
It is requested that a photograph of Emma Thynn, Marchioness of Bath be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
If I understand things correctly her father-in-law had a dispute with her husband about some murals, which is why the father-in-law did not attend the wedding. And her mother-in-law made some remarks that were described as racist. That sucks, but is that family drama really important enough to mention on an article about the wife of the son of those people? In my opinion this article should be about her, and encyclopedias should not focus on gossip. If their behaviour should be mentioned anywhere it should be on their articles, and it is already: Anna_Thynn,_Marchioness_of_Bath#Personal_life_and_death and Alexander_Thynn,_7th_Marquess_of_Bath#Personal_life. Polygnotus (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is an encyclopedia, we don't list the diseases BLP subjects may have had on their articles unless there is a reason to. Weird how this is far more likely to happen to women than men (what is the last time you read about the reproductive health of a male BLP subject on their wiki article?). What is the point of mentioning it? And just because its mentioned in a newspaper does not mean we have to mention it as well; they don't follow our rules and their goal is to sell newspapers. Polygnotus (talk) 14:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not suggesting a "list the diseases". I'm suggesting that this is a rare, and thus notable, medical condition. If it was widely reported, I see no reason for it to be excluded. I haven't checked. I think promotion of an awareness of health issues is overall a good aim. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We are not going to "raise awareness" of diseases by mentioning every disease every BLP subject may have had. And of course the fact that someone with no medical training is aware of the existence of a disease they know nothing about does nothing to help those who actually suffer from that disease. If it has been widely reported has little to no bearing on whether it should be included or excluded; see WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Your local weather forecast has been widely reported, but there is no Wikipedia article about it. I agree that the medical condition itself is WP:NOTABLE, and we have an article about it, but the fact that this person may have been diagnosed with that condition is not. Polygnotus (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I'm not sure I was advocating "mentioning every disease every BLP subject may have had" or creating an article about "my local weather forecast." Looks like we'll have to agree to differ on this. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Polygnotus: I did not "add irrelevant personal medical information and information about non-notable children into the article", I reverted your edit which removed well-sourced information. If there is consensus that that information, although widely reported, is irrelevant then that is fine by me. But let's not make false accusations here. Thank you! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In American English double negatives are (often? always?) used for emphasis, which is funny if you listen to police interrogations. Polygnotus (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
