Jump to content

Talk:Emma Goldman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Emma Goldman/Comments)
Featured articleEmma Goldman is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 19, 2008.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 18, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 27, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 21, 2011, December 21, 2013, December 21, 2016, and December 21, 2019.
Current status: Featured article

"Influenced" list underpopulated?

[edit]

Seems like it. I bet there are more recent anarchist writers (as in from around her death to today or so) who cite her as an influence. Sadly, I'm not exactly some scholar on anarchism. I was able to think of Bookchin, though. VintageVernacular (talk) 18:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VintageVernacular, please see the instructions at Template:infobox philosopher. It says Entries in influences, influenced, and notable ideas should be explained in the main text of one of the articles. Those that are not mentioned in the main text may be deleted. Schazjmd (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The template also states "only add entries which are explained and cited in the body of the article (or cited here)", suggesting that those who are added to the influenced list and cited may be included. Noe Ito is currently included and mentioned only in the infobox, with a citation. :3 F4U (they/it) 20:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nursing and my edits to the "Inciting to riot" section

[edit]

I performed some edits tonight to the "Inciting to riot" section of the article. Most of the edits were copyediting; however, I also edited the statement that she studied medicine when, in fact, most WP:RS (which I added to support my edit) state that she in fact informally studied nursing in prison, which, while having some overlap with medicine, is distinct.Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]