Talk:Dual Universe

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Physics, Cosmology or Information theories

Dual Universe is an interesting game idea. Are any scientists looking at a concept of a dual universe theory instead of multiverses or high numbers of dimensions? This could be a physics, cosmology or maybe even information theory. A short note could be put under ‘See Also’.

A good example of dual spaces is in crystallography. There is a lot of use of dual spaces to describe crystals and more recently quasicrystals and aperiodic crystals. I have investigated these for some years.

Extending this to the universe would be challenging, but could provide interesting insights into things like entangled quantum states and quantum computing.

Any links to investigate this further? CuriousMarkE (talk) 10:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source reference number 20 is incorrect

The source reference number 20 is incorrect, it links to a page that cannot confirm the content in question.

Jean-Christophe Baillie, Novaquark's original CEO, claims to have originated the idea for Dual Universe in 2011. Can anyone provide a real, up-to-date source for this? 2003:F8:BF15:C100:9DD1:3C72:8B66:3367 (talk) 04:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the link, back to the original linkedin article. Jcbaillie (talk) 07:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approaching the very large exodus of the initial player base

There should be a section about the criticism of previous and current state of the game that lead to most alpha backers leaving the community. In particular of the state of PVP at beta start, of the several resets made after promising that players playing beta would keep their stuff on release. On the winning of meta gaming in pvp, leading to a very small group of people preventing the rest from accessing 70% of the world.

Also very important. the collapse of the ore node mechanic, being replaced by the auto-miner technology. Beta was "sold" to players as having this ore node mechanic, where any player could find the "holy grail" and become rich, for many years of alpha footage. And was replaced on beta, after feature closing, after players were promised a persistent world. 85.242.92.205 (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]