Jump to content

Talk:Dress (Taylor Swift song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 12:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: ToNeverFindTheMets (talk · contribs) 21:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review @ToNeverFindTheMets! So does this grant an official pass? Gained (talk) 08:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToNeverFindTheMets: are you sure that you have completed all the review steps, including spotchecks? Most reviews contain feedback that can be used to improve the article (even if that feedback is optional as it goes beyond the GA criteria). If you have finished the review please look at "Step 4" of the instructions. — Bilorv (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bilorv: Given that the GA reviewer was blocked indefinitely, could you take over this GAN? Ippantekina (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

[edit]

Proper grammar used throughout, good prose practised, organized cleanly, Manual of Style followed properly.

Citations

[edit]

All claims made in the article appear to be properly cited. No copyrighted content is used in the sections. Non-dynamic refs excluded, all applicable sources are archived.

Neutrality

[edit]

All opinions are from independently-sourced third-party reports. Subject matter is written in objective fashion.

Notability

[edit]

Taylor. F~~king. Swift. No concern here.

Images / audio

[edit]

Image(s) used are free use, audio falls under and abides by fair use policies.

Audio

[edit]

Audio used is expressive of a certain important theme / part of the song. Used importantly, this validates the inclusion.

Stability

[edit]

No reasonable evidence found suggesting serious disputes about content / "edit warring" occuring on page.

Topic discussion

[edit]

Article stays on topic throughout, no digressions. Proper charts are good to see. Sexual content is discussed in a proper, factual manner.

My verdict

[edit]

It's all A-OKAY. Yes, this should qualify as a good article.