Talk:Dragon's Lair

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Outfolded (3 participants)
NoFrag (1 participant)
VoxelStorm (0 participants)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (3 participants)
FloodSim (3 participants)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (2 participants)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dragon's Lair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140601190904/http://www.digitalleisure.com/ to http://www.digitalleisure.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

I'm doing some of my first edits and I tried to fix the lead section. Would like to get feedback and/or go-ahead to remove the infobox. thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PraiseVivec (talk • contribs) 13:30, October 29, 2018 (UTC)

@PraiseVivec: Hi there. That's a really good job on that lead. I just copy edited it a little. It's so good it makes me think it should be its own "Overview" subsection, and then the lead resummarized from that! Seriously. Because the purpose of a lead is to summarize the body, so much that it doesn't even require citations; whereas some of this stuff is actually absent from the body. Maybe that's not necessary but you're deep into it and I'm just scanning, so I'll defer that to you. Did you just now write all this originally? Good job. And...what? Remove the infobox? What are you talking about? Of course we're not removing a valid infobox. — Smuckola (talk) 19:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Smuckola: Thanks for the feedback. And about the infobox...sorry, I'm still figuring out the terminology. I was referring to the box at the top of the page that signaled the lack of a proper lead. For some reason I thought that was called an infobox. Sorry for the confusion. Also, I tried to write in the lead all the info someone who would want to read up on the series in 60 seconds or less would need. The port history is confusing particularly confusing for this series (two main games, but close to a dozen named entries in the series) so that's why I tried to cram as much info in the lead as possible.

@PraiseVivec: Be sure to sign your posts with four tildes ~~~~, like it says under the edit window. Yeah after I said that, I wondered if you meant the warning box. Yeah I removed the warning template because you blew it up. ;) Yeah so it's really good. On another note, I wish the "Games" section was not written as a bulleted list. It's tacky and bad form to write body prose as a list. That's the kind of thing that I laboriously rewrite or reformat, but I'm not messing with that at the moment. — Smuckola (talk) 20:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Smuckola: Thanks for the signature tip! Also, the way the Games section looks also bugs me, but I'm not sure what other format would look best. If you're able to give me any ideas on that, I can try and do it. PraiseVivec (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay

I would like to know why other video game articles on wiki don't have the same guide book/Trivia info that this page is being allowed to have?

It doesnt. I guess youre looking at a different article. — Smuckola (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne

The Daphne page should be restored. There are enough sources.
https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Princess_Daphne_(Dragon%27s_Lair)&diff=prev&oldid=1160612827

Kenixkil (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]