Jump to content

Talk:Led Zeppelin Definitive Collection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remaster

[edit]

Is this a third remastering? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWantedFan69 (talkcontribs) 10:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection. Jenks24 (talk) 08:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Definitive Collection Mini LP Replica CD BoxsetDefinitive Collection of Mini-LP Replica CDs (Led Zeppelin boxed set) – consistent with album packaging; includes band's name in article title. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Radiopathy •talk• 16:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ironic you state I have a non-policy based rationale, when that's exactly what you have in your other move request. Again, WP:CIR on your part. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Considering your opinions at the Box Set move request, it seems you're the one with issues about IDONTLIKEIT. It has clearly been shown to you at that discussion that "box set" is acceptable English even appearing in Oxford dictionaries. Considering that this nomination and the box set's nomination occur on the same day, it would appear the two are related. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. It's not down to the nom to "endorse" other user's comments. The closing admin will do so. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:Lugnuts old chap, there's a lot of Definitive Collections. What if readers know the band but don't know the exact format? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, interesting! Happy to go for Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection then. Ramble On, everybody. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 16:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You don't think that Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection would be less of a mouthful/easier to type? Anyway, I support the original RM as well. Any result that leads to the band's name being added would meet WP:SONGDAB vs the dozens of other Definitive Collection. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Led Zeppelin Definitive Collection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]