Talk:Defeating ISIS

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Defeating ISIS article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Defeating ISIS was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 8, 2017	Articles for deletion	Kept
June 12, 2017	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 8, 2017	WikiProject approved revision	Diff to current version
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 10, 2017. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Donald Trump said he read the book Defeating ISIS by Malcolm Nance while a candidate for U.S. president?
Current status: Former good article nominee

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2017. The result of the discussion was Keep, per WP:SNOW.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Military history: Technology / Middle East / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK?

Sagecandor, have you considered nominating this for WP:DYK? It should be eligible. I know that you withdrew the GA nom, but DYK is a good interim step. Neutrality^talk 19:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality, perhaps you'd like to do it. I seem to be stepping on toes lately. Maybe best to defer to your judgment about what best to write about it for DYK ? Sagecandor (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutrality:I took your advice and nominated it at Template:Did you know nominations/Defeating ISIS. Sagecandor (talk) 01:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maddow quote

Rachel Maddow quote is directly relevant to the book and the topic of this article. No idea about this edit [1], but it is not explained here on the talk page. Sagecandor (talk) 01:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Copied from your talk page) Your ES made no sense. Re-read the comments in the source and you will see you misconstrued them completely. zzz (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not misconstrue anything. I merely quoted directly from the cited source itself. The reader can then read the direct quote. Sound good, we can add it back with just the quote and no misconstruing? Sagecandor (talk) 01:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you claiming, after re-reading as suggested, that you did not misconstrue (i.e. misrepresent) the comments? zzz (talk) 01:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. How so? Sagecandor (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The citation is: Chotiner, Isaac (April 11, 2016), "Rachel Maddow Always Believed in Bernie Sanders", Slate, retrieved June 8, 2017
Maddow says: "Malcolm Nance has this new book out about defeating ISIS. It’s not like a prose book. It’s like an encyclopedia."
The quote is about this book.
The quote gives the title of the book in the quote, Defeating ISIS.
The quote has a link inside the quote to the Amazon.com page about the book.
We should therefore include this sourced material in this article, as directly relevant to the book. Sagecandor (talk) 01:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the rest of the paragraph in the source? zzz (talk) 02:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she reads the book she refers to as an encyclopedia before bedtime. Not as relevant to this article. The quote, above, is directly relevant to this article. Sagecandor (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did I say "read the next sentence and stop there"? No, I said "read the rest of the paragraph". I'm not sure exactly what your issue is (probably a combination of factors), but I've had enough of playing this game. zzz (talk) 04:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I read the entire article when I did the initial research for this article. It's directly relevant to the book. You have failed to explain yourself. Will add it back to this article, barring a specific explanation as to why it the source should not be included in this article. Sagecandor (talk) 04:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Should this quote from notable person Rachel Maddow be included in this article: "Malcolm Nance has this new book out about defeating ISIS. It’s not like a prose book. It’s like an encyclopedia." ? Sagecandor (talk) 04:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third Opinion Response

I'm going to suggest a middle way here: Reference the quote in the footnote, rather than the body of the article. In-article text can note that Maddow referenced this book as a source she used to educate herself about ISIS, as that is entirely consistent with what the article says. Then any desired quote can be included within the footnote itself, so the coverage does not appear WP:UNDUE in comparison to those who have offered more substantive commentary on the work itself. I will leave this page watchlisted for a few days for further discussion if needed. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jclemens:Agreed. Done. [2]. Look good? Sagecandor (talk) 06:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty literal--I was suggesting a direction for commentary rather than specific wording--but it certainly appears to work. Jclemens (talk) 06:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it could probably use some rewording (or removing entirely), but it seems to work. Thanks. zzz (talk) 06:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with keeping wording suggested by third-party previously uninvolved Jclemens. Sagecandor (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trump says he read the book during 2016 campaign

Trump says he read the book during 2016 campaign.

First reported in Time magazine.

Was either in August 1, 2016, August 8, 2016, or August 22, 2016 edition.

Doing further research on this. Sagecandor (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meacham, Jon (July 25, 2016), "Cover Story: Gut Check - Donald Trump - What a President Needs to Know", Time, vol. 188, no. 4, p. 42, ISSN 0040-781X, retrieved June 19, 2017, When he reads books, he says, he reads quickly. He likes biographies of Lincoln, Nixon and Reagan and recently read Edward Klein's hostile books on the Clintons and Defeating ISIS by Malcolm Nance.

Done. Full citation. Full quotation. Notable author. Notable source. Reliable source. Time magazine. Sagecandor (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added [3]. Sagecandor (talk) 22:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]