Talk:Deerfield School District 109
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Deerfield Public Schools 109 → Deerfield School District 109 – Probably uncontroversial: Move over top of inferior duplicate stub, but proposing here because target does exist. Proposing to move this longer-history, sourced stub at awkward name Deerfield Public Schools 109 to more official name, over top of shorter-history unsourced stub currently at target Deerfield School District 109. The target name's current stub contains no additional information or sources, so does not require merging, and can simply be discarded by the move. (I've moved the additional WikiProject banners from the target talk page to this talk page as part of this edit, so it can be moved over the top of the target.) Closeapple (talk) 00:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support seems obvious.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Discussion already closed, but I support the move. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation Page Needed
[edit]This page has a very similar name with Deerfield Public Schools and because of that I think it needs a disambiguation page. Jakeable (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
I added a citation
[edit]I added a citation for the paragraph without one, so I think the "This article needs additional citations for verification." notice could be removed. Let me know what you think!