Talk:Cover system
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cover system article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Cover system" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | A fact from Cover system appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2009, and was viewed approximately 6,057 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Really?
[edit]Does this REALLY warrant an article? It's not even industry standard, and most of it is written as if someone outside the industry were examining it and came up with an uneducated conclusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.4.28 (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Like to also add that the article is heavily bulked up by irrelevant references to assorted game titles, to the detriment of the article's quality 115.70.109.186 (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
This article seems pretty good to me, aside from any lack of criticism in the Reception area. I see no problems with it otherwise. 72.192.119.52 (talk) 18:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- 72.192.119.52 2601:4C4:4001:9F60:197C:184C:C9A9:CCDD (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
De-emphasizes combat
[edit]I don't think the author knows what direct confrontation means since whether one unit attacks another from front or flank the two units are in direct confrontation.
I am acquainted with many cover using games and apart from a few dedicated sneak and stealth games, which use cover very differently to most games, none of them de-emphasise combat, the cover only exists to reduce damage or heal. The section is unsubstantiated and the only reference in it is about two sentences long one of which says "so there's [sic] a lot of point rewards for getting out and getting in the faces of your enemy" which is the opposite of de-emphasizing combat. Waerloeg (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cover system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713004733/http://uk.guides.ign.com/guides/14538/page_7.html to http://uk.guides.ign.com/guides/14538/page_7.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713004742/http://uk.guides.ign.com/guides/14538/page_13.html to http://uk.guides.ign.com/guides/14538/page_13.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713004749/http://uk.guides.ign.com/guides/14538/page_6.html to http://uk.guides.ign.com/guides/14538/page_6.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Cover system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110920015149/http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6181783.html?sid=6181783&part=rss&subj=6181783 to http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6181783.html?sid=6181783&part=rss&subj=6181783
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120121223026/http://www.1up.com/features/uncharted-afterthoughts to http://www.1up.com/features/uncharted-afterthoughts
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110130033135/http://au.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/rainbowsixvegas/review.html to http://au.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/rainbowsixvegas/review.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928051131/http://features.teamxbox.com/xbox/1747/Gears-of-War-Five-Things-You-Didnt-Know/p1/Gears to http://features.teamxbox.com/xbox/1747/Gears-of-War-Five-Things-You-Didnt-Know/p1/Gears
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://videogames.yahoo.com/news-1251752
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)