Talk:Compound of dodecahedron and icosahedron

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Duplication?

The point of the image on the right is that it is from the same perspective as the one on the left.

@Tomruen: Concerning keep one old image to avoid duplication:
How is a perspective a duplicate to the three orthogonal projections? (compare cube and octahedron)
In fact the image you have added is a duplicate of the orthogonal projection from the 2-fold axis that is already there. Watchduck (quack) 18:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I see the table image was different from the 3 symmetry position forms. But I was thinking to keep a variety of images. Tom Ruen (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How about the two images together below the stat table? Tom Ruen (talk) 19:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's also what I thought. They actually make more sense right next to each other. Something simple like this would be good as an introductory image. Watchduck (quack) 19:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]