Jump to content

Talk:Code Breaker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Sections begun in 2006)

[edit]

   In the period of 3 minutes and a few seconds, starting 16:50, 15 January 2007‎, User:Jtalledo made 5 edits on this talk page, relating to the following edit-hx entries; 4 of those 5 edits concern (but do not all match up 1-to-1 with) the following 5 talk-history entries:

The 4 of Jt's edits i'm discussing affected the three following "ordinary-level sections" within this current talk "super-section"; Jt's purpose in making the 4 was to add attribution to 5 edits that were left unsigned & undated by their respective contributors:

  1. (fixed at 16:50:53): (re 18:30, 6 October 2006‎ edit) "24.217.13.77" (but should have been attributed to Xeon25 [and thus see next (16:51) fix]:)
  2. (fixed at 16:51):
    changed attribution from 24. ... to "Xeon25";
    also (re "22:11, 5 October 2006‎ ) "24.217.13.77"
  3. (fixed at 16:52): In the "Importance" section, 2 separate contribs attributed respectively to
    Xeon25 [&]
    71.38.245.79
  4. (fixed at 16:53): 71

[Saving prior to completion, let alone checking against errors due to confusion]--Jerzyt 08:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phew, this was nine years ago! And you made detailed lists and everything! There must be some kind of record! Heh. Good on you, pal. --Jtalledo (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

[edit]

The article was labeled with a lack of importance on the subject matter. Would someone care to elaborate? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xeon25 (talkcontribs). —Preceding undated comment added 11:47, 3 October 2006‎

RE [WW]: I think it hits the importance fine. It gives a history of the codebreaker, even if it does have a few blank spots. Some more community esque things could be noted, but thats all side stuff. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.217.13.77 (talkcontribs).—Preceding undated comment added 22:11, 5 October 2006‎

Overhaul

[edit]

I gave the article a complete overhaul. Some new info about the site and a brief history about the Code Breaker was added, and I cleaned up the grammar a bit. Anything else to add? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xeon25 (talkcontribs).

Actually, the site for new codes for the Codebreaker, CMGSCCC.com appears to be down. Might be an issue with my computer, but I highly doubt it, at this point. -- K1darkknight (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not down. There may be times when users will encounter database errors and such, but they're often corrected quickly. -Xeon25 (talk) 09:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Pelican accessories is no longer making versions of Codebreaker because no one wants lawsuits for jacking into the game's scripts": What?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.120.143 (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CodeBreaker DS

[edit]

The CodeBreaker DS will be shipped sometime next week. Be happy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.38.245.79 (talkcontribs).

Pure speculation. I'm an administrator on the official site, and there has been no official release date given. -Xeon25 22:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Sections begun 2007 or later)

[edit]

Disambiguation page needed?

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that "codebreaker" redirects here. I just clicked on the codebreaker link found at the introduction of the article Voynich_manuscript.However, it refers to cryptanalysts, not to the cheat device "Code Breaker" (obviously).

Should "codebreaker" redirect to Cryptanalysis? Or should we create a disambiguation page? Please help, I am a newbie and I don't know how to do it.77.49.2.144 09:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Table of Contents tag

[edit]

Just a heads up, with my addition of the External Links section, I included the No Table of Contents tag to prevent the currently unneeded TOC from displaying.

Zet Hikari 20:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many were there?

[edit]

Aside from DS and PS2, there's also a Game Boy Color version. They seem to be pretty rare. Were there any others? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.59.175.105 (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have the PS1 version. - MK (t/c) 10:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]