Jump to content

Talk:Chongqing Rail Transit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phase 4 Map

[edit]

I have created a map of the system as it will look after the completion of phase 4 (including lines 7, 15, 17, 24, 27 and extensions of lines 4 and 18). Am I allowed to upload it in the expansion section of the page?Argybz (talk) 10:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About the Loop Line

[edit]

Does anyone know the official name of it? Circle Line, Loop Line, Line 0, or something else?David S. Hwang (talk) 00:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

What happened to Line 1?--Matt Whyndham 16:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There're some info from the Urbanrail.net, http://urbanrail.net/as/chon/chongqing.htm.

Line 1 is planned, but the project has run into "Legal Difficulties".

Chongqing metro line 1 was officially open to traffic on July 28, 2011 with a total length of 15.7KM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.98.77.244 (talk) 04:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Chongqing Rail Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chongqing Rail Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Chinese editors?

[edit]
  • Chinese communist editors have infiltrated and trying to hide China's shoddy, miserable construction habits by removing incidents and accidents from projects that involves China or Chinese companies. This is not Baidu Baike or any communist state-run media, where facts and "uncomfortable" events can be hidden, otherwise this is not "free" encyclopedia anymore, but another mouthpiece for pathetic Chinese projects. Furthermore, someone with "aiguo" (爱国) in its name is clearly sponsored by Chinese state (wumao), who is spending their time clearing up Wiki articles whenever an accident is revealed, and trying to look offended whenever his true purpose on Wiki is pointed out. 187.209.3.177 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @187.209.3.177: Recording the event itself doesn't mean that you can include your own political opinions in the section. Actually, Chinese Wikipedia, which is contributed mostly by users from Hong Kong and Taiwan, provides a impersonal narration of this incident, and thus you can just translate it rather than write your emotional sentences. PLEASE avoid adding unsourced sentences like:

The investigation also pointed out the serious flaws in the usually careless, Chinese-style safety regulations as well as the shoddy design of the door, which could be opened by slight wind or vibrations in case of malfunction.

David Xuang (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@187.209.3.177: I chose that screenname long ago, without reference to either the PRC or ROC. You can take your knowingly false WP:MEATPUPPET accusations to yourself and stop abusing proxies to jump continents every fifty seconds. DX's edits are fine, your editorials are nakedly POV-driven. TL;DR sod off. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 20:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chongqing_Rail_Transit&oldid=1204620659"