Talk:Chessmaster 2000

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Comparison of OpenGL and Direct3D (0 participants)
Matt Firor (0 participants)
Portugal 1111: A Conquista de Soure (3 participants)
Ciberbit (1 participant)
Beamable (2 participants)
Iikka Keränen (2 participants; relisted)
Miika Huttunen (0 participants; relisted)
Harry M. Rubin (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Info

I was doing a little Chessmaster research for my son and ran into this. I am going to move these details into the Chessmaster article and remove the merge recommendation.

Bill Sempf (talk) 02:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't realize that was bad. Figuring out a better way.

Bill Sempf (talk) 02:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 12:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chessmaster 2000 → The Chessmaster 2000 – Full, common title DigitalIceAge (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 08:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not to include "The" at the beginning of a title is a common and difficult question on Wikipedia per WP:THE. The OP here has not provided any evidence for the assertion that this topic meets the criteria for prefixing with "The". I personally don't think it does. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalIceAge and BarrelProof: Ping current participants. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. A majority of the references and external links listed in this article do not seem to use "the", therefore leave the status quo. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my previous comment above. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move. The common name appears to omit the "the", despite the official name using it. O.N.R. ^(talk) 12:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:THE. Starting an article title with "the" is generally discouraged. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.