Talk:Characters of Silent Hill 2

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Redirect to Silent Hill 2

Hi everybody. I think this page should be redirected to Silent Hill 2 since the vast majority of it is simply repeating what is already stated in Silent Hill 2. In short, there doesn't seem to be a reason for this page since it can be easily covered in the plot and a "Characters" subsection in Silent Hill 2. Ideas? Kaguya-chan (talk) 21:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one replied, I will redirect the page to Silent Hill 2. Kaguya-chan (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you not use the best of the character info in the main article first? Silence does not really mean other editor agreement. This article is a lot of gamecruft but still it contains valuable info on characters. — Hellknowz ▎talk 22:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I already created a "characters" subsection for the plot, which combined with the "influences and design" section of Silent Hill 2 covers everything in this article (I think). Kaguya-chan (talk) 22:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seems reasonable. There may be more non-OR material to add. — Hellknowz ▎talk 22:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. Nothing's perfect and it is very possible that I overlooked something. Kaguya-chan (talk) 23:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No quarrel then, I leave it at your discretion as far as I'm concerned. Have fun! — Hellknowz ▎talk 23:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Have fun too! Kaguya-chan (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]