Talk:Castleford–Garforth line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Castleford–Garforth line is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 5 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to Castleford–Garforth line. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 01:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castleford to Garforth Line → Castleford to Garforth line – Downcase per WP:NCCAPS; sources mostly do not cap it. Optionally, say if you prefer to use the symmetric dashed version (Castleford–Garforth line) rather than "to" between place names. Dicklyon (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence in sources

news
books

Please examine the searches, see if there is a common name, whether the dashed version is preferred, and whether caps are preferred. It is my impression that there is no proper name here and that the dashed form is more logical and more consistent with other such lines. Possibly Castleford–Garforth branch line as in some sources. Dicklyon (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nom with preference for dashed form, either Castleford–Garforth line or Castleford–Garforth branch line. Dicklyon (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - no preference on titling though would prefer a dash. The joy of all things (talk) 23:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.