Talk:Cardiac conduction system

Anatomy: Systems High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to systems.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the heart.

On 15 August 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Electrical conduction system of the heart to Cardiac conduction system. The result of the discussion was moved.

moderator band

The proposed role of the moderator band should be included in this article. My knowledge does'nt extend far enough to do it myself, so could someone else!

Snellios 08:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ecg animation

The animation is incorrect. The aortic valve only opens after left ventricular contraction causes left ventricular pressure to exceed aortic pressure. Essentially, the animation skips one of the isovolumetric phases of the cardiac cycle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.20.212.128 (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i have edited the caption to indicate that the red lines represent the depolarization wave. an unsophisticated reader, it seemed to me, might have taken it for bloodflow.Toyokuni3 (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i also wonder if it wouldn't be possible to make the image able to be stopped, so as to allow the rader to more easily correlate mechanical and electrical activity.Toyokuni3 (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question to all. Enlighten me.

Is the slope of AV node Phase 4, the same as the slope of SA node Phase 4?? (Phase 4 is the refractory period.) I understand that the SA node has a higher rate of fire, but do both pacemaker cells have the same length in refractory period. I cannot find this information anywhere.

-Student —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.177.25.230 (talk) 06:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Left Posterior Fascicle

I added some more information on the function of the right vs. the left posterior fascicles of the left bundle of His. Do you think this fits best here, or would be better in the [Bundle Of His] page? Alsiola vet (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anatomy

This page illutrates hard anatomic wiring of the cardiac autonomic nervous system through tunnels of Collagen. Further anatomic and histologic definition is needed to define rate limiting characteristics. Imaging of valvular coaptation is important but outside the scope of this article.

Missing references etc.

There are references, external links and possibly sections of info missing from this article. The last clean version I can find was on 15 April 2011 by NilsTycho (talk). The article was then partially blanked and not reverted. Obviously reverting a year of edits will create its own problems so I'm reluctant to do that. Someone may need to copy and paste the missing info, someone familiar with the subject would probably be best. Any thoughts/opinions? Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just now restored the text that was deleted by Jclemens at 21:59, 10 May 2011 with the edit summary "tweak". Nurg (talk) 10:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Left fascicle

In the article, below the first image, it says "5. left anterior fascicle 6. left posterior fascicle". However, in the description of the imagen at commons says "5. Left posterior fascicle 6.Left-anterior fascicle". Which is wrong?--Hiperfelix (talk) 03:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New image from Blausen

Hi all, I recently helped to upload a donation of 20 heart-related illustrations by Blausen Medical (see commons:Category:Images from Blausen Medical Communications). I've been inserting them into articles. The image to the right below seem particularly suited for this article, but it already has many images so I wasn't sure where to put it. Do you think it's useful, and if so could you help me insert it? Thank you! Dcoetzee 08:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electrical conduction system of the heart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050601073326/http://www.auburn.edu:80/academic/classes/zy/560/heart_1/sld008.htm to http://www.auburn.edu/academic/classes/zy/560/heart_1/sld008.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding content

Can I add this in (Atrioventricular block) in see also Priyavarthini (talk) 11:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Electrical conduction system of the heart → Cardiac conduction system – Cardiac conduction system is by far the more usual term and the only term that comes up on nGrams. Google hits are also far less Iztwoz (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Anatomy has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Neuroscience has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Physiology has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support – From some cursory research, there doesn't seem to be an overwhelming WP:COMMONNAME, but "cardiac conduction system" does seem to predominate slightly over other variants. The proposed title also improves upon WP:CONCISE. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.