Talk:Cab forward

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	March 24, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Road Vehicles

Should this section be an article in its own right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.193.99.43 (talk) 08:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While the term "cab-forward" may have been first used in automobiles on the Pacer, it certainly wasn't the first to use the concept. There are almost certainly more vehicles that fit the mold, but the one that comes to mind is the original Mini. It had the rear wheels nearly as far back as they could go without extending out of the body, the leading door edge is very close to the front wheel wells, while the bottom of the windshield is very nearly over the front axle. It also has a considerably shorter hood. It was also designed to seat 4 (admittedly not overly tall or wide) people while being over 1m shorter, .5m narrower with a wheelbase only(compared to over all length) .5m less. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.253.35.194 (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Automobile (and truck) "cab-forward" or "forward control" certainly deserves its own article rather than that single not very accurate paragraph. The Pacer and the Mini don't even enter into it, since the term refers to vehicles where the driver is positioned right up front over the engine, such as forward control Landrovers, "flat face" trucks, some minivans, etc. The German Wikipedia has a pretty detailed article on this: Frontlenker. Unfortunately my German is minimal and the Babelfish translation is not too good. I might still have a go, though. Salmanazar (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about cab forward or forward control? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davert (talk • contribs) 15:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

There seems to be no need for some of material to be duplicated in the Cab forward (car) article because all of it is in the automobiles section within this article. — CZmarlin (talk) 04:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it is delineated as a separate section, I agree. It's worth noting that Chrysler's use of the term "cab forward" is different from the older locomotive etc. use - it was not merely Forward Control (putting the cab as far forward as possible) but was also moving the wheels out toward the corners, etc. Nothing particularly new, but the label is identified with a specific group of cars. (I would like to head off efforts to drag every person's favorite old car into the fray as "this was the REAL first cab forward car," because Cab Forward was a marketing term in this context, not a specific design feature - and cars with shortened hoods and reduced overhang have been around for a long, long time.) Davert (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the merge, and clarified the headings a bit. Wongm (talk) 01:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OP-15947.jpg

The image Image:OP-15947.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Iain Bell (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to locomotive section

The "clarification needed" is right - driver's cab immediately forward of firebox doesn't make a lick of sense. Replaced it with "boiler", removing "immediately" because on coal-fired designs the smokebox is between driver and boiler.

I fear some of the visibility stuff is now duplicated, but I do think an explanation of why one builds such a thing needs to come further up the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkbeast (talk • contribs) 01:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coal-burning?

As far as I know, there is no such thing as a coal-fired cab forward locomotive since there is no way to get the fuel from the tender to the firebox. This section makes little sense. Nickrz (talk) 20:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hence (as the section explains) with a conventional tender the stoker's position would remain behind the firebox even if the driver was moved forward. They would communicate with bell codes as on the GWR steam rail motors, or on a GWR Autocoach.

The very first locomotive mentioned, the Reichsbahn's 05 003, was a coal-fired cab forward locomotive. So are the Italian locomotives mentioned next, which had a water tender but a coal bunker in the cab. Hence if you think there is no such thing you are mistaken. I don't know that there were ever very many such locomotives compared to the Southern Pacific's large supply of oil-fired cab-forwards. Pinkbeast (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cab forward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022040030/http://www.amcpacer.com/features/did-the-pacer-kill-amc.asp to http://www.amcpacer.com/features/did-the-pacer-kill-amc.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cab forward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420195854/http://www.steamlocomotive.com/cabforward/ to http://www.steamlocomotive.com/cabforward/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]