Talk:Brava, Cape Verde

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cape Verde (assessed as Top-importance).

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Who fled where when?

The article seems to contradict itself regarding the volcanic eruptions and subsequent migrations involving Brava. The first two sections state:

First settled in the 1540s, its population grew after Mount Fogo on neighbouring Fogo erupted in 1675.

and

Brava has no documented historical eruptions

but the section on the history, says:

In 1680, the inhabitants fled to the nearby large island of Fogo after the volcano erupted and lava began to flow and devastate.

Should this last section read: "...fled from the nearby large island..."? Kutulu (talk) 18:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! :) I suppose so, but since I don't know about that myself I wouldn't like to give you my word on that. But everything seems to point that way, yes. --Waldir ^talk 21:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the proper preposition is "from" and not "to." I lived on Fogo for two years, and am very familiar with Brava. The eruption that is being referred to is an eruption on Fogo, whose eponymous volcano is the only active volcano in the archipelago. Obviously, then, Brava has not had an eruption, nor even an active volcano, in its recorded history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.42.145 (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Economy

The passage which reads "The airline service ended in 2004. Brava never had tourism. Tourism slowly boomed. The island is unsuitable for beach tourism because the steep shoreline allows few beaches" needs some cleaning up. It contradicts itself in more than one place. First it states that Brava never had tourism, then it immediately proceeds to tell us that it did during the unspecified period in which it "slowly boomed."

And that phrase in and of itself is a contradiction in terms. If an industry experiences a boom-time, that precludes it from slowly developing. Because, of course, it's a boom.

I suspect that whoever wrote this speaks either Kriolu (the common language in Cape Verde) or the official Portuguese, so that may explain the confusion with English. It's a good try, but it didn't come out quite right.

74.215.42.145 (talk) 04:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brava, Cape Verde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060116083217/http://www.umassd.edu:80/SpecialPrograms/caboverde/brava.html to http://www.umassd.edu/specialprograms/caboverde/brava.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brava, Cape Verde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081118142225/http://www.ine.cv/index.aspx to http://www.ine.cv/index.aspx
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ine.cv/censo/censo2010.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.umassd.edu/SpecialPrograms/caboverde/brava.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]