Talk:Biniverse

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Concerts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Concerts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of concerts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConcertsWikipedia:WikiProject ConcertsTemplate:WikiProject Concertsconcert articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Rating

FYI: I just changed the article rating from B to C using WP:Rater. Royiswariii (talk) 12:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I think you have meant "from C to B", but no worries. Thank you for the recent ratings on Bini-related articles and Kaia (group).

Just a friendly note: You might have noticed that the Rater tool’s dialog includes a machine-generated prediction of article quality (from ORES) in the lower right corner. While this prediction can be helpful for quickly assessing the quality of articles, it's important to remember that it should be taken with a grain of salt as human evaluation of article quality is continually needed. You can also find this note at Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines/Assessment#Rater and User:Evad37/rater#Assessment advice. If you need guidance on assessing content quality, you can refer to the grading scheme table found in Wikipedia:Content assessment. AstrooKai (Talk • Contribs) 13:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your friendly note! I always check Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines/Assessment#Rater and User:Evad37/rater#Assessment advice since the rater was a prediction and need a human evaluation for that. Royiswariii (talk) 13:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]