Talk:Beimen metro station

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Requested move 5 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved (non-admin closure) Mahveotm (talk) 07:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– Part of an effort to standardize station names across Taiwan. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Taiwan#Station_article_titles Szqecs (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Brad v 12:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – You should link directly to the proposed convention at User:Szqecs/Naming conventions (Taiwan stations); but maybe get it out of your user space first and put it into a relevant project page; and cross-link to other open RM discussion(s), and maybe say why you prefer a WP:UKSTATION-like style than WP:USSTATION. I'm included to support the proposal, as it's at least fixing the over-capitalization problem, but the current state of the project pages suggests that this may be premature. Dicklyon (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's so premature about it when it isn't controversial? I've made many related moves in the past without any comment. The reason I'm doing RM is because of the large number. Szqecs (talk)

It seems out of order to base your moves on a new convention that's not yet on the project page. I'm not saying it's controversial, just seems out of order. Dicklyon (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I consider it a user essay per WP:USERESSAY. Szqecs (talk) 04:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:NCCAPS, MOS:CAPS, MOS:PN, and WP:CONSISTENCY with numerous past RMs and various RfCs on "line" and "station" over-capitalization. Any handful of ambiguous results will obviously be fixed with further disambiguation. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 15:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.