Talk:Battle of Đồng Đăng (1885)

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / European / French / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 23, 2014, February 23, 2015, and February 23, 2016.

use of "refuse"

Can anybody explain the meaning of "refuse" in "he [de Négrier] now decided to refuse his left wing"? I have a feeling this must be some sort of artefact of translation, or such, but no idea what. If it's other than the common meaning of to decline to accept, or reject, etc., is there a more obvious substitute?

Graham.Fountain | Talk 14:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move of 27 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 16:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Đồng Đăng → Battle of Đồng Đăng (1885) – The year of the battle should be clearly stated to distinguish from the Battle of Dong Dang (1979). Dino nam (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Dino nam:, that doesn't quite suffice in terms of rationale. The 1885 is currently set up as a primary topic. This would suggest that battle has considerable more historic importance than the one of 1979. It also has more internal wikilinks than the other article. You would need to argument why the 1979 is at least equally important as the 1885 battle. In that case, the page could be moved, and a dab page created. --Midas02 (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually when I established the article about the 1979 battle, I didn't know how to change names of articles, so I had no other choice but to leave the name of this article like that, and I think that's why it has still been the primary topic until now. I have never seen see any academic RS that says which battle has more historic importance than the other. In fact, when I search for the 1885 battle on Google, there are only about 34,100 results; 193,000 results are detected when I search for the 1979 battle.117.6.88.137 (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support making the two base names becoming MILHIST one set index listing all the battles while both articles have years on their names -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support proposed move, with a disambiguation page at the basename - unless someone can clearly show that one of the battles is definitely the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Bazonka (talk) 10:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.