Talk:Banjska (village)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Kosovo

	Banjska (village) is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 27 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Banjska. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Železnička Stanica Banjska

Also near the village to the east. train station on the main river Ibar ? /highway north. 42°58′55″N 20°49′23″E / 42.981944°N 20.823056°E / 42.981944; 20.823056 Banjska Železnička Stanica Železnička Stanica Banjska Zeleznicka Stanica Banjska Stanica Banjska James Michael DuPont (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banjska Reka

42°59′14″N 20°45′20″E / 42.987222°N 20.755556°E / 42.987222; 20.755556 also next to Banjska (village), to the north, and listed next Banjski Suvi Do on google maps. According to the topographic map, there is a stream there, a Reka in a valley, so that would make sense.

Биштанска Река Бањска Река Rekë e Banjskës Reke e Banjskes Bištanska Reka Bistanska Reka Banjska Reka Bastanska Reka James Michael DuPont (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banjska Reka next to Malisheva

42°29′05″N 20°44′07″E / 42.484722°N 20.735278°E / 42.484722; 20.735278 FULL_NAME Banja Reka Banjska Reka Next to Malisheva James Michael DuPont (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banjska Reka 3

next to Banjska_(village) 42°58′40″N 20°47′58″E / 42.977778°N 20.799444°E / 42.977778; 20.799444 Reka Banjska Reka Baštanska Reka Bastanska Reka Banjskë Banjske

James Michael DuPont (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All of my GNS data is extracted from GNS

Please, I dont want to waste any more time on this. All the locations in my huge list of names is extracted from the gns database, please dont make me look up every single one of them for you. thanks, James Michael DuPont (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Banjska (village). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031008130923/http://www.nima.mil/gns/html/index.html to http://www.nima.mil/gns/html/index.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.banjska.org/kontakt.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Insufficient data to determine primary topic, given the dab at the base page has just been improved and the spike in page views due to the recent attacks. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Banjska (village) → Banjska
Banjska → Deleted to make way for page move

– The village is the usual meaning of Banjska. The monastery is linked in this article & isn't simply referred to as Banjska. The dab page shouldn't exist. Jim 2 Michael (talk) 11:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:DABCONCEPT at least. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess this would be a logical continuation of the edit I did in 2011. Apparently we started with a redirect to the monastery before the village article had existed, but it's fair to use the natural disambiguation in the monastery's title as is and move the base name to the gazetteer entry. --Joy (talk) 11:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An anonymous user added the Banjska River to the disambiguation page, which now actually makes it useful, and so it should stay. There's also a Banjška which can be listed here for navigation purposes. Please feel free to withdraw the proposal. --Joy (talk) 09:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support move~~; oppose deletion per Joy. Move the disambiguation page to → Banjska (disambiguation). If one still thinks there is need for deletion, take it to AfD. SilverLocust 💬 22:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SilverLocust the problem is we have no explanation why the village is the "usual meaning" of the term. With the river effectively hidden away until very recently, it's unfair to examine statistics (and even these ones are unclear). There's also some recentism involved as the most popular topic is the recent armed conflict there. --Joy (talk) 07:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Joy: It wasn't clear to me that you took issue with the assertion that "Banjska" in isolation would primarily refer to the village. I was unsure of that but didn't have reason to doubt that this would be an incomplete name for the other topics (_ monastery, _ river, _ plateau, _ attack). But given that you are questioning that, I'd agree that more evidence is needed. SilverLocust 💬 07:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The village has 10,559 viewscompared with only 19 for the river and 122[[1]] for Banjšice Plateau so the village seems to be primary over the unrelated uses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Crouch, Swale but your starting position is incorrect. Of course the village has that many views when we didn't even link the other things up to yesterday. And when the monastery, that was linked, has a similar amount of views, then it stands to reason that we ought to do our due diligence and give a chance for the other topics to show up in the statistics. If in two months time we see a clear picture in WikiNav that practically everyone who looked up "Banjska" went to the village, then we can safely short-circuit. --Joy (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The pageviews are not indicative of long-term significance because they are currently inflated by the Banjska attack, whereas during 2022 the plateau got the most views followed by the monastery ([2]). The river is still far behind in that period (619 vs 82) but the margin is not nearly as extreme as the recent statistic suggests. BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

See also