Talk:Australian honours and awards system

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Australian honours and awards system article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Orders, decorations, and medals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Australian honours and awards system is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

On 20 March 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved from Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia to Australian honours system. The result of the discussion was page moved.

On 13 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 4 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Australian honours system → Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia – Per WP:CONSISTENCY with all equivalent articles in Category:Orders, decorations, and medals by country. PPEMES (talk) 11:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Current title is recognisable, natural, precise, concise and consistent (Irish honours system, Papua New Guinea honours system, Fijian honours system, New Zealand royal honours system, South African honours system). Celia Homeford (talk) 12:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Uh? What is the argument for change? Wikiain (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, as per editors' counter-arguments up to now. Wikiain (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per Celia Homeford's statement. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 04:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Except all equivalent articles in the category tree do not have this structure. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Title is clear and recognizable. Barca (talk) 15:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Battle honours

Hello fellow Australian honours and awards enthusiasts. It is proposed merging the content on battle honours in this article to existing articles Battle and theatre honours of the Australian Army and Battle honours of the Royal Australian Navy or creating a general "Australian battle and theatre honours” article to put them in, given they are not formally part of the Australian honours and award system (which only recognises individuals and groups of individuals - not organisations, even the odd balls, the UCG & MUC are primarily focused on those individuals who earned that unit award).

A battle honour is granted through the Royal Prerogative of the monarch, but exercised by each branch of the Australian Defence Force (the Army also has theatre honours). Policies for battle honours for each service are different and there is no joint or tri-service policy. Battle honours are seen as important aspects of tradition by some, and poorly understood by the majority. They are not seen as the primary means of recognising teams and groups for gallant or meritorious service in the way UCG, MUC or Commendations for Service are. Defence Honours and Awards and Commendations Policy Review, 8 February 2008

If no objections raised before 24 June 2020, I’ll merge it off this article. In the meantime, all interested are welcome to discuss. Kangaresearch 10:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:New Zealand royal honours system which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed medals

Hello all,

before I go spending any time on it, I thought I might see if anyone has any objections or thoughts to me trying to put in a 'proposed medals' section. I would be only listing those proposed by government reviews, DHAAT & other internal defence recommendations and not the numerous recommendations from the public. It comes to mind since five new medals have now been proposed.Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]