Talk:Asteroids in fiction

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asteroids in fiction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Asteroids in fiction has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 23, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Asteroid Ceres in fiction was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 1 September 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Asteroids in fiction. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

A fact from Asteroids in fiction appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in many works of fiction, the asteroid belt is the remnants of a destroyed planet?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Asteroids in fiction.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 07:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that in many works of fiction, the asteroid belt is the remnants of a destroyed planet? Source: See the sources in the "Remnants of a planet" section, e.g. the "asteroids" entry of The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Gary Westfahl's Science Fiction Literature through History: An Encyclopedia , p.139
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Obliterate! (video game) and Template:Did you know nominations/AT 2021lwx
- Comment: I'm open to rephrasing the hook to make it more catchy.

Improved to Good Article status by TompaDompa (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 20 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

TompaDompa (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Extremely nice and well done article about Asteroids in fiction. I am myself an avid reader of SF, but after reading this article I see myself as a novice. Length and time of creation are ok, the article seems to be well sourced through reference works (AGF assumed on references referring to non reachable pages) hook is cited and interesting, no obvious copyvio detected. QPQ has been done. Good to go! And now I am going to read the other articles of this author... Alex2006 (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you, that's very kind. You may have noticed Comets in fiction currently on the WP:Main page as the DYK picture hook today. Otherwise, I would consider Mars in fiction my magnum opus, as it were. I would also like to spotlight Venus in fiction, which I can only take partial credit for as it was written in collaboration with Piotrus. TompaDompa (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]