Talk:Apocalyptica (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Infobox and release date

Hmm, most video games have an infobox and a picture of the boxart. Somebody sort that please. The date of release needs double checking as well, Apocalyptica (disambiguation) says that it was 2003, this article says 2004. Digifiend (talk) 08:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the need for an Infobox.

According to the article, the game runs on "PC". Instead, the article should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the Vgclegend template. For example, if Apocalyptica only runs on MS-DOS, then Apocalyptica's Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.

ProResearcher (talk) 02:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

third-person shooter

With melee weapons? It may have FPS style multiplayer modes, but I consider it to be a third-person action game, the same genre as Tomb Raider. Digifiend (talk) 11:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The game does have some first person aspects, but as you said, it is a third-person shooter--xgmx (T | C | D | R) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.78.170 (talk) 15:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apocalyptica (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025060233/http://visugold06.uuhost.uk.uu.net:80/ to http://visugold06.uuhost.uk.uu.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]