Talk:Agent A: A Puzzle in Disguise

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (1 participant)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Deletion

I am creating this section for discussion of towards the proposed deletion of the article. I think we ought not get rid of this article. It talks a about a game which is worth mentioning. I do not see why it does not qualify as a notable article.Jtrrs0 (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi please read WP:GNG this should help you understand why I tagged it. --Domdeparis (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it. And that is why I ask for your specific reasons. Jtrrs0 (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may have read it but I'm not sure you understood it. Please explain why it is notable. There is nothing in the article that claims notability. The WP:GNG start with "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." you need to show this in the article. I can't really be clearer than that, the guidelines are very simple really. --Domdeparis (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

:The Metacritic reviews show notability and a pass of GNG, It would improve the article if you could summarise each review in the reception section with a reference to each individual review on their own website, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the guidelines, and they simply don't apply. A quick google search will bring up a fair number of articles. If that coverage is not widespread enough for you then neither is most of Wikipedia's articles'.Jtrrs0 (talk) 01:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

InfoBox

I have added an infobox for this article. It is still in need of game box art, however.

Sequel

I'm about the delete the section at the end which talks about a sequel. If you read the linked interview with the developer more closely you'll see that he's not talking about a sequel but in fact discussing a release date for the second chapter (the interview was conducted after the release of the first chapter) so currently, to my knowledge, there is no plans for a sequel; indeed they're still actively developing the final two chapters for the game. I've added a section with a chapter list and the current release status of each to replace the sequel chat so hopefully that'll make things clearer for people. I'm struggling to get source for that admittedly because I can't access Twitter here at work which is where the dev mentions the planned November release for chapter 4 but I'll try to remember to add that in later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.148.198.157 (talk) 09:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]