Talk:A Guilty Conscience (2023 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,039)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,447) • Stub-Class articles (6,730)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (389) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 5 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: 2023 film not moved, but moved 1921 film and disambiguated due to consensus that there is no primary topic. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– Far more likely search term than an obscure old film, so move that to A Guilty Conscience (1921 film) and add a hatnote. At the very least, make this title a dab for the two, but I think readers are far more likely to expect to read about this topic than other other. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate there is also a 1931 film listed at List of Egyptian films of 1931; and a see also for Guilty Conscience (disambiguation) -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Hong Kong has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support or disambiguate. The 2023 film has 4,423 views compared with only 12[[1]] for the 1921 film. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate It's standard practice to include the year of release in the film title. Concurrently the 1921 movie should be moved to “A Guilty Conscience (1921 film)”. Andro611 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I modified the request to formally include A Guilty Conscience → A Guilty Conscience (1921 film) (Wikipedia:Requested moves#Request all associated moves explicitly). Adumbrativus (talk) 21:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose 1st move, support 2nd per WP:PFILM, which specifically states that there is special consensus for film articles not to use incomplete disambiguation, even if one film may be more notable than others. This is not local consensus but a legitimate sitewide guideline permissible per WP:PRECISION, and has been discussed numerous times. InfiniteNexus (talk) 08:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose 1st move, support 2nd per InfiniteNexus and WP:RECENT. I've literally never heard of this film so how can it be the only one I'd be searching for? Supports based on view count falls under WP:RECENT, of course it has more views, it was released in the last 12 months, the other over 100 years ago, it certainly does not mean it is the PRIMARY topic. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1st move, support 2nd per arguments stated by Darkwarriorblake and Canadian IP. Andro611 (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1st, support 2nd. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.