Talk:63rd Street lines

63rd Street lines has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 5, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 2, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 20, 2018.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 63rd Street Line, a three-station subway line in New York City, was initially described as a "tunnel to nowhere" because it had no connections to other subway lines in the borough of Queens?

Current status: Good article

Trains: Rapid transit / in New York City Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as High-importance).

Improving this article

I have been adding references to this article. I have found a few good possible references.

I hope to make this article a good article. --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kew Gardens 613: What's the name of the Municipal Archives report you uploaded to Flickr two days ago? It might be a good source, especially the "Evaluation of Options". epicgenius (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need to check.I only scanned a few pages. There are about 20 other pages. I must have forgotten to upload it a few years ago. I will see if I can find the name.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. epicgenius (talk) 02:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 63rd Street Lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160225054749/http://web.mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/151214_0930_LIRR.pdf to http://web.mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/151214_0930_LIRR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:63rd Street Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am quickfailinig this article largely for violating WP:WIAGA #2. There are large swaths of uncited text, including several entire paragraphs. No paragraph should be without citation since each should present a new idea in a well-organized article. There are even instances of successive uncited paragraphs.

The New York Times is a great WP:RS, you may want to broaden to other sources as you complete the citation request above although it is not required.

I would also encourage merging or expanding stubby paragraphs.

Also dollar amounts greater than 10 years old should probably have dollar conversions. See how they are employed in articles such as Bobby Orr or Jackie Robinson.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Archer Avenue Lines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]