Talk:2024 CFL draft
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 27 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2024 CFL Draft to 2024 CFL draft. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:CFL Draft which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 29 September 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
- 2024 CFL draft → 2024 CFL national draft
- 2023 CFL draft → 2023 CFL national draft
- 2022 CFL draft → 2022 CFL national draft
- 2021 CFL draft → 2021 CFL national draft
- 2025 CFL draft → 2025 CFL national draft
– Now that CFL draft is ambiguous with CFL global draft, would it be better to have less ambiguous titles for the national drafts? Dicklyon (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment/Question. Are most reliable sources doing this? Wikipedia should not do this before RS do. For example, this Apr 30, 2024 article from Athlon Sports first states,
Starting at 11 am EST, the CFL Global Draft gets underway
, then statesThe next phase of the day ends with the CFL Draft which starts at 8 pm EST
(not "2024 CFL national draft"). Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)- Good question. I was bothered by the ambiguity, and confused until I sorted it out in my mind, but it's not obvious if a move is the solution. That's why I phrased the proposal as a question. If it's better to wait and see if the disambiguated name catches on in sources, that's fine, too. But then maybe a hatnote or something to say there's another article about the other part of the draft would be in order? Dicklyon (talk) 22:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)