Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 August 22

< August 21	August 23 >

August 22

File:Bobby Parnell on June 17, 2009.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OR Unused and ridiculously low resolution - a higher res version of this image already exists (albeit cropped) at Commons as File:Bobby Parnell on June 17, 2009.jpg. I don't see a use for this image. Mosmof (talk) 04:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:World population density.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Small, unused - replaced by better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Population_density_with_key.png Bulwersator (talk) 07:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if there's a better version now by all means remove it. TastyCakes (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ARM logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is even simpler than Edge logo, so even in UK it is below threshold of originality - in result it may be deleted as copy exists on Commons Bulwersator (talk) 07:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is your evidence that it is below the threshold of originality of the United Kingdom? Being less complex than the Edge logo is not a sufficient condition since the British court never defined the Edge logo as a lower limit. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I should use "likely to" somewhere. Bulwersator (talk) 10:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Logo is strictly text. I have no problem deleting if it is being kept on Commons. Buffs (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FNN logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is even simpler than Edge logo, so even in UK it is below threshold of originality - in result it may be deleted as copy exists on Commons Bulwersator (talk) 07:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Logo is strictly text-only logo. I have no problem deleting if it is being kept on Commons. Buffs (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sts31 flight insignia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo - unused, without description Bulwersator (talk) 08:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete replaced by File:Sts31 flight insignia.png on commons. Note, the file name is sufficient description to figure out what it is. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 04:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Higher-res image available. Concur that file name is sufficient for description & request less robo-signing. Buffs (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Upper Falls 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without description, usage and quality. Bulwersator (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like it was double imaged and out of focus -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:University of Cambridge Crest.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this as replaceable fair use because of File:Cambridge University Crest.svg, but the tag was removed without explanation. This is indeed replaceable fair use. Stefan2 (talk) 09:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I originally uploaded this image to replace File:Cambridge University Crest.svg, as that one is incorrectly rendered (and also mis-tagged/sumarized, from what I can tell - it's a tracing of another version that claims to be under a creative commons license). I was under the impression that the general consensus is that logos and other things which are to represent entities on their own pages should be accurate and so I am not sure if it's replaceable (with the given image). I am not steadfastly sure of the policies involved so do correct me if this is not the case. 8AE34D5F29933DED51D0A42F7454AEF2 (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons:COM:COA#Definition and representation, the image on Commons appears to be correctly rendered. According to Commons:COM:COA#Public domain definition (blason), the licence on Commons appears to be correct. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly the Commons licensing appears to be accurate — it's unusual for coats of arms to be copyrightable (as opposed to individual creations of them). Given commons:User:Massive hair has granted Free rights to the image, I see no reason to disbelieve that. Whilst I can't see any reason for File:University of Cambridge Crest.svg to be deleted on licence grounds, the File:Cambridge University Crest.svg has a larger nominal size, which I would prefer. I don't believe there are any licensing problems here, though, and (depending on the source of the image itself) User:8AE34D5F29933DED51D0A42F7454AEF2 could change the fair-use issue by changing the licence on their upload easily enough. I have no strong feelings on the deletion, though, given the replaceability of this coat of arms. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 21:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phycomyces blakesleeanus2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 22:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same file is on flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/xerantheum/5165925422/ , on account with the same name. Is it safe to assume that it is the same person? (on flickr it is " All Rights Reserved ") Bulwersator (talk) 10:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Date it was posted to Flickr: November 10, 2010 at 7.20PM PDT

Date it was posted to Wikipedia: 2010-11-11T03:49:27 CET

If I get things right, the file was posted to Wikipedia half an hour before it was posted to Flickr (but please check so that I didn't get the time zones wrong). Almost same time & identical user names, so presumably safe. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"The Untold Story of Indians in Africa".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unlikely to be used Bulwersator (talk) 11:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The source is the pictures area of the facebook account of a user by the same name as the uploader. Such sources have no proof of copyright ownership. Unless some form of proof is provided, whether this picture is later used or not, it is likely to be a breach of some unnamed person's copyright and needs to go. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spot on analysis by first "del" comment.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mariah Carey on May 23, 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My {{subst:rfu}} was deleted. This is indeed replaceable, since the person is alive. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[[tl|rfu}} should not be removed, and any WP:NFCC#1 question should be contested on the image talk page. Also, the Flickr user does not own the image. Anyway, speedy delete --Mosmof (talk) 01:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Devita Saraf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No articles are logged as linking to this file. The uploader is indef sockpuppet blocked, and is unlikely to furnish OTRS with a timely rationale. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dead NYC Subway Rat.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, image was such awful quality, Commons would have gotten rid of it, too. — ξ ^xplicit 22:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not really of any use. Sreejith K (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it's a different picture of a rat -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 04:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hell Gate Bridge plaque.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 22:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am assuming that the text is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the plaque dates to 1917, so even if the text was copyrighted, the copyright has expired. Also, if I'm not mistaken, until the 1976 Copyright Act, a copyright notice was required to claim copyright, which this plaque does not include. Finally, as a pragmatic matter, it seems unlikely that Amtrak (the successor of the railroads) or the American Bridge Co. would object. --Macrakis (talk) 16:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/move to commons mark PD-expired per Macrakis -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/move to commons what the IP said. Buffs (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hhbridge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Web-resolution. May be a copyright infringement. Sreejith K (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:X3-Gold box small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free file used only in a gallery Yoenit (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:X-Gold box DE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file only used in a gallery Yoenit (talk) 16:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:{{{Uploader}}}#File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg listed for deletion|{{{Uploader}}}]] ([{{fullurl:User talk:{{{Uploader}}}|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/{{{Uploader}}}|contribs]] | [[Special:ListFiles/{{{Uploader}}}|uploads]] | [[Special:Log/upload/{{{Uploader}}}|upload log]]).

{{{Reason}}} Buraidah (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buraidah (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:{{{Uploader}}}#File:Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia.jpg listed for deletion|{{{Uploader}}}]] ([{{fullurl:User talk:{{{Uploader}}}|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/{{{Uploader}}}|contribs]] | [[Special:ListFiles/{{{Uploader}}}|uploads]] | [[Special:Log/upload/{{{Uploader}}}|upload log]]).

Buraidah (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Salam Sejahtera, saya minta jasa baik tuan untuk saya ganti logo ini dengan logo yang baruBuraidah (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.