Jump to content

Zinc–bromine battery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Zinc-bromine flow battery)
Zinc–bromine battery
Specific energy60–85 W·h/kg
Energy density15–65 W·h/L (56–230 kJ/L)[1]
Charge/discharge efficiency75.9%[2]
Energy/consumer-priceUS$400/kW·h (US$0.11/kJ)[citation needed]
Cycle durability>6,000 cycles
Nominal cell voltage1.8 V

A zinc-bromine battery is a rechargeable battery system that uses the reaction between zinc metal and bromine to produce electric current, with an electrolyte composed of an aqueous solution of zinc bromide. Zinc has long been used as the negative electrode of primary cells. It is a widely available, relatively inexpensive metal. It is rather stable in contact with neutral and alkaline aqueous solutions. For this reason, it is used today in zinc–carbon and alkaline primaries.

The leading potential application is stationary energy storage, either for the grid, or for domestic or stand-alone power systems. The aqueous electrolyte makes the system less prone to overheating and fire compared with lithium-ion battery systems.

Overview

[edit]

Zinc–bromine batteries can be split into two groups: flow batteries and non-flow batteries.

There are no longer any companies commercializing flow batteries, Gelion (Australia) have non-flow technology that they are developing and EOS Energy Enterprises (US) are commercializing their non-flow system.

Features

[edit]

Zinc–bromine batteries share six advantages over lithium-ion storage systems:

  • 100% depth of discharge capability on a daily basis.[3]
  • Little capacity degradation, enabling 5000+ cycles
  • Low fire risk, since the electrolytes are non-flammable
  • No need for cooling systems
  • Low-cost and readily available battery materials
  • Easy end-of-life recycling using existing processes

They share four disadvantages:

  • Lower energy density
  • Lower round-trip efficiency (partially offset by the energy needed to run cooling systems).
  • The need to be fully discharged every few days to prevent zinc dendrites, which can puncture the separator.[3]
  • Lower charge and discharge rates

These features make zinc-bromine batteries unsuitable for many mobile applications (that typically require high charge/discharge rates and low weight), but suitable for stationary energy storage applications such as daily cycling to support solar power generation, off-grid systems, and load shifting.

Types

[edit]

Flow

[edit]

The zinc–bromine flow battery (ZBRFB) is a hybrid flow battery. A solution of zinc bromide is stored in two tanks. When the battery is charged or discharged, the solutions (electrolytes) are pumped through a reactor stack from one tank to the other. One tank is used to store the electrolyte for positive electrode reactions, and the other stores the negative. Energy densities range between 60 and 85 W·h/kg.[1]

The aqueous electrolyte is composed of zinc bromide salt dissolved in water. During charge, metallic zinc is plated from the electrolyte solution onto the negative electrode (carbon felt in older designs, titanium mesh in modern) surfaces in the cell stacks. Bromide is converted to bromine at the positive electrode surface and stored in a safe, chemically complexed organic phase[clarify]. Older ZBRFB cells used polymer membranes (microporous polymers, Nafion, etc.) More recent designs eliminate the membrane.[4] The battery stack is typically made of carbon-filled plastic bipolar plates (e.g. 60 cells), and is enclosed into a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) container. The battery can be regarded as an electroplating machine. During charging, zinc is electroplated onto conductive electrodes, while bromine is formed. On discharge, the process reverses: the metallic zinc plated on the negative electrodes dissolves in the electrolyte and is available to be plated again at the next charge cycle. It can be left fully discharged indefinitely. Self-discharge does not occur in a fully charged state when the stack is kept dry.

Features

[edit]

Zinc–bromine flow batteries do not enjoy the advantage of scale that other flow-battery technologies enjoy. Storage capacity cannot be increased by simply adding additional electrolyte tanks (the stack must also be scaled up).

Zinc-bromine hybrid-flow batteries have many specific disadvantages:

  • Reset: Every 1–4 cycles the terminals must be shorted across a low-impedance shunt while running the electrolyte pump, to fully remove zinc from battery plates.[3]
  • Low areal power: (<0.2 W/cm2) during both charge and discharge, which increases the cost of power.[5][6][7]
  • Low Round Trip Efficiency: <70% on an RTE basis, significantly lower than Li-ion batteries, which typically reach 90% or more.
  • Low energy-density:
  • Complex construction with moving parts
  • Poor reliability: no manufacturer has yet to produce a reliable Zn-Br flow battery

Design

[edit]

The two electrode chambers of each cell are typically divided by a membrane (typically a microporous or ion-exchange variety). This helps to prevent bromine from reaching the negative electrode, where it would react with the zinc, causing self-discharge. To further reduce self-discharge and to reduce bromine vapor pressure, complexing agents are added to the positive electrolyte. These react reversibly with the bromine to form an oily red liquid and reduce the Br
2 concentration in the electrolyte.[citation needed]

Developers (all now defunct)

[edit]
  • Primus Power – Hayward, California, is a privately held US company. However, as at May 2023, they had had no installations since 2015.[8] Primus Power claim 70% efficiency for their 125 kWh unit.[9] Although the Primus Power website is still live, the company is not operating.
  • RedFlow Limited – went into voluntary administration on the 23rd of August, 2024,[10] and was liquidated in December 2024.[11] Their ZBM3 battery has very poor reliability and performance.
  • EnSync (Formerly ZBB)[12] – Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, US (defunct).[13]

Non-flow

[edit]

Non-flow batteries do not pass battery materials between two tanks.

Developers

[edit]
  • Gelion: Thomas Maschmeyer at the University of Sydney replaced the liquid with a gel. Ions can move more quickly, decreasing charging time. The gel is fire-retardant.[14] In April 2016 Gelion, launched. The company earned an A$11 million investment from UK renewables group Armstrong Energy.[15] Gelion raised further capital with an IPO and listed on the AIM London Stock Exchange 30 November 2021. However, Gelion is now focussed on its Li-S-Si battery technology and doesn;t appear to be investing in it Zn-Br technology.
  • EOS Energy Enterprise cathode: As of May 2023 EOS had announced its Eos Z3 battery and claimed an order backlog of 347MWh and a total 2.2GWh of binding orders.[16] EOS claimed its battery has an RTE "in the mid 80s" (with reduced depth of discharge) and a lifetime of 6,000 cycles/20 years.[17]

Electrochemistry

[edit]

Flow and non-flow configuration share the same electrochemistry.

At the negative electrode zinc is the electroactive species. It is electropositive, with a standard reduction potential E° = −0.76 V vs SHE.

The negative electrode reaction is the reversible dissolution/plating of zinc:

At the positive electrode bromine is reversibly reduced to bromide (with a standard reduction potential of +1.087 V vs SHE):

So the overall cell reaction is

The measured potential difference is around 1.67 V per cell (slightly less than that predicted from standard reduction potentials).[citation needed]

Applications

[edit]

See EOS Energy website. They are currently the sole commercial supplier of Zn-Br batteries.

History

[edit]

Many Zn-Br flow battery tech companies have gone broke. EOS Energy and Gelion are the only two that remain trading, both have non-flow Zn-Br technology.

As of November 2021 EOS Energy Enterprises had secured a 300 MWh order from Pine Gate Renewables, with installation planned for 2022.[18]

As of February 2022, Gelion announced an agreement with Acciona Energy to trial Endure batteries for grid-scale applications.[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Khor, A.; Leung, P.; Mohamed, M.R.; Flox, C.; Xu, Q.; An, L.; Wills, R.G.A.; Morante, J.R.; Shah, A.A. (June 2018). "Review of zinc-based hybrid flow batteries: From fundamentals to applications". Materials Today Energy. 8: 80–108. doi:10.1016/j.mtener.2017.12.012. hdl:10397/77992. S2CID 117522227.
  2. ^ "Performance Testing of Zinc-Bromine Flow Batteries for Remote Telecom Sites" (PDF). Sandia National Laboratories. 2013. p. 6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-04-29. Retrieved 2015-04-01.
  3. ^ a b c Rose & Ferreira, p. 4.
  4. ^ "US20200036046 MEMBRANE-FREE NON-FLOWING SINGLE CELL ZINC BROMINE BATTERY WITH BROMINE-TRAPPING COMPOSITE CARBON FOAM ELECTRODE". patentscope.wipo.int.
  5. ^ G. P. Corey, An Assessment of the State of the Zinc-Bromine Battery Development Effort. RedFlowLimited Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2011.
  6. ^ Nakatsuji-Mather, M.; Saha, T. K. (2012). "Zinc-bromine flow batteries in residential electricity supply: Two case studies". 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/PESGM.2012.6344777. ISBN 978-1-4673-2729-9. S2CID 22810353.
  7. ^ Suresh, S.; Kesavan, T.; Munaiah, Y.; Arulraj, I.; Dheenadayalan, S.; Ragupathy, P. (2014). "Zinc–bromine hybrid flow battery: effect of zinc utilization and performance characteristics". RSC Advances. 4 (71): 37947. Bibcode:2014RSCAd...437947S. doi:10.1039/C4RA05946H. ISSN 2046-2069.
  8. ^ "Primus Power". primuspower.com. Retrieved 2023-05-14.
  9. ^ "Primus Power". primuspower.com. Retrieved 2022-02-08.
  10. ^ "Redflow Enters Voluntary Administration". asx.com.au. Retrieved 2024-10-28.
  11. ^ Purtill, James (2024-12-05), "Redflow was the great hope of Australian manufacturing. Its collapse left customers with broken batteries", ABC News website, archived from the original on 2024-12-04, retrieved 2024-12-04, Redflow's assets are now being liquidated after the administrator was unable to find a buyer for the business.
  12. ^ "ZBB Energy changes name to EnSync".
  13. ^ Nick Williams (2019-03-13). "EnSync Energy intends to initiate insolvency, cuts nearly all employees". Milwaukee Business Journal.
  14. ^ "Catalyst/BATTERY POWERED HOMES". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2 February 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
  15. ^ "Australian gel-based battery technology attracts major UK finance". 13 April 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
  16. ^ "Eos Energy Enterprises Reports First Quarter 2023 Financial Results". Bloomberg.com. 2023-05-09. Retrieved 2023-05-14.
  17. ^ "Technology". Eos Energy Enterprises. Retrieved 2023-05-14.
  18. ^ "Eos Energy secures order for 300 MWh of battery storage systems". Renewablesnow.com. Retrieved 2022-02-08.
  19. ^ Vorrath, Sophie (2022-02-02). "Gelion to trial its zinc bromide batteries with Spanish solar farm". RenewEconomy. Retrieved 2022-02-08.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Zinc–bromine_battery&oldid=1264283857"