Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Project Page
WPMED Newsletter and signup
Manual of style (medicine)
Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
List of participants
Popular pages
Assessment (Log)
How to help:
Article alerts and resources for editors
Articles for cleanup, deletion, and
orphaned
Patrol recent changes and sort stubs
Requested articles
Categories:
Project
Articles by quality and importance
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
[edit]Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Category:Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
[edit]
Category:Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Two editors objected to the use of the Guttmacher Institute as a sourse for the Abortion article, so I started an RfC on this question, see [1]. Your participation is welcome. NightHeron (talk) 12:17, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act. Wes sideman (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Request for a draft review
[edit]Hi! Because I hold personal persuasions on the issues, I wanted to refer a draft–Draft:National Mobilization for Reproductive Justice–to this WikiProject for review. If you are not an AFC reviewer but feel comfortable assessing the draft and determining if it's suitable for the mainspace, please give me your assessment and I will gladly implement it. I could go either way on this one and the cooperativeness from the creating editor makes me want to expedite this process to allow them to move on to other projects. Please feel welcome to ping me here, on the draft talk page, or my talk page! ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Proposed merge: gynecologic oncology into gynecologic cancer
[edit]Please see Talk:Gynecologic cancer for the discussion. Thanks. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)